Xcel Energy to Remain Neutral (BIP) (EOC) (PIKE) (XEL)

Zacks

We reiterate our Neutral recommendation on Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL). The Minneapolis-based electricity and natural gas company at present carries a Zacks Rank #2 (Buy).

Why the Reiteration?

We believe the company’s successful cost-containment efforts and favorable outcomes of the NSP Minnesota and NSP Wisconsin rate cases will act as tailwinds in the upcoming quarters.

Xcel Energy is expected to derive substantial benefits from its ambitious CapX2020 transmission program in Minnesota, which received regulatory approval. The Bemidji-Grand Rapids Transmission line, a part of CapX2020 was completed and the 230-Kv (Kilovolt) line has already come into service.

The company is also striving to develop its renewable business. As of now it has added 1,713 megawatt of wind energy in Colorado. This will certainly complement Xcel Energy’s future growth. The onset of production tax credits is expected to act as a major catalyst to the company’s eco-friendly endeavors.

Moreover, a sound financial position and maintenance of a favorable credit rating are other positives that could work in favor of Xcel Energy.

The Zacks Consensus Estimate for the first quarter 2013 is set at 41 cents per share, up an estimated 6.73% from year-ago earnings of 38 cents per share.

Other Stocks to Consider

While we believe Xcel Energy will perform satisfactorily in the coming quarters, other utility companies worth a look are Brookfield Infrastructures Partners (BIP), Pike Electric Corp (PIKE) and Empresa Nacional Electricidad SA (EOC). All the above currently carry a Zacks Rank #1 (Strong Buy).

BROOKFIELD INFR (BIP): Free Stock Analysis Report

ENDESA-CHILE (EOC): Free Stock Analysis Report

PIKE ELECTRIC (PIKE): Free Stock Analysis Report

XCEL ENERGY INC (XEL): Free Stock Analysis Report

To read this article on Zacks.com click here.

Get all Zacks Research Reports and be alerted to fast-breaking buy and sell opportunities every trading day.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply